← All models
MiniMax · mit
MiniMax M2
MiniMax M2 by MiniMax appears in 1 source with Reasoning at 33.6. Best read for Code quality, Long context, Low cost.
CreatorMiniMax
Release date2025-10-27
Knowledge cutoffNot published
Context1M tokens
Input price$0.3/M tokens
Output price$1.2/M tokens
Modalitytext
CountryCN
Metrics
All source-backed metrics
LLM Stats Rank49ranking · source_rank
Reasoning33.6reasoning · index_reasoning
Math25.57math · index_math
Coding23.28coding · index_code
Research4.85research · index_search
Writing19.02writing · index_communication
Vision6.07multimodal · index_vision
Tool calling13.93tool_calling · index_tool_calling
Finance29.56domain · index_finance
Legal29.54domain · index_legal
Healthcare29.28domain · index_healthcare
GPQA78 %reasoning · gpqa_score
AIME 202578 %math · aime_2025_score
SWE-bench Verified69.4 %coding · swe_bench_verified_score
Code Arena966.66 %coding · coding_arena_score
Humanity Last Exam12.5 %reasoning · hle_score
BrowseComp44 %research · browsecomp_score
Terminal Bench46.3 %coding · terminal_bench_score
SciCode36 %coding · scicode_score
Context1,000,000 tokenscontext · context
Speed358.51 c/sperformance · throughput
Latency1,663.1 msperformance · latency
Input price0.3 $/Mpricing · input_price
Output price1.2 $/Mpricing · output_price
Parameters230,000,000,000 paramsmodel · params
Evidence
Citations and source overlap
FAQ
How should I read this profile?
Treat this as a source-backed model dossier, not an EvalKit-run verification. The public values are replicated from linked sources and kept source-scoped.
Is MiniMax M2 verified by EvalKit?
No. EvalKit currently shows 0 verified rows until real run evidence exists.
Why can metrics disagree?
Different sources test different tasks, dates, prompts, and aggregation methods. EvalKit keeps those differences visible instead of merging them into a fake universal score.