← All models
OpenAI · proprietary
GPT-5
GPT-5 by OpenAI appears in 1 source with Reasoning at 44.66. Best read for Code quality, LLM, Multimodal.
CreatorOpenAI
Release date2025-08-07
Knowledge cutoffNot published
ContextUnknown
Input priceUnknown
Output priceUnknown
Modalitytext + vision
CountryUS
Metrics
All source-backed metrics
LLM Stats Rank56ranking · source_rank
Reasoning44.66reasoning · index_reasoning
Math38.73math · index_math
Coding33.85coding · index_code
Research13.29research · index_search
Writing29.52writing · index_communication
Vision31.37multimodal · index_vision
Tool calling23.22tool_calling · index_tool_calling
Long context32.32long_context · index_long_context
Finance45.34domain · index_finance
Legal45.4domain · index_legal
Healthcare41.4domain · index_healthcare
GPQA85.7 %reasoning · gpqa_score
AIME 202594.6 %math · aime_2025_score
SWE-bench Verified74.9 %coding · swe_bench_verified_score
Code Arena885.94 %coding · coding_arena_score
Humanity Last Exam24.8 %reasoning · hle_score
MMMU84.2 %multimodal · mmmu_score
MMMU-Pro78.4 %multimodal · mmmu_pro_score
BrowseComp54.9 %research · browsecomp_score
FrontierMath26.3 %math · frontiermath_score
CharXiv-R81.1 %multimodal · charxiv_r_score
Evidence
Citations and source overlap
FAQ
How should I read this profile?
Treat this as a source-backed model dossier, not an EvalKit-run verification. The public values are replicated from linked sources and kept source-scoped.
Is GPT-5 verified by EvalKit?
No. EvalKit currently shows 0 verified rows until real run evidence exists.
Why can metrics disagree?
Different sources test different tasks, dates, prompts, and aggregation methods. EvalKit keeps those differences visible instead of merging them into a fake universal score.