← All models

Zhipu AI · mit

GLM-5.1

GLM-5.1 by Zhipu AI appears in 2 sources with Reasoning at 54.18. Best read for Coding, High intelligence, Low cost.

CreatorZhipu AI
Release date2026-04-07
Knowledge cutoffNot published
Context200K tokens
Input price$1.4/M tokens
Output price$4.4/M tokens
Modalitytext
CountryCN

Metrics

All source-backed metrics

Open in leaderboard
LLM Stats Rank5ranking · source_rank
Reasoning54.18reasoning · index_reasoning
Math46.76math · index_math
Coding42.99coding · index_code
Research29.67research · index_search
Vision39.03multimodal · index_vision
Tool calling28.89tool_calling · index_tool_calling
GPQA86.2 %reasoning · gpqa_score
Code Arena1,801.81 %coding · coding_arena_score
Humanity Last Exam52.3 %reasoning · hle_score
BrowseComp79.3 %research · browsecomp_score
Toolathlon40.7 %tool_calling · toolathlon_score
MCP Atlas71.8 %tool_calling · mcp_atlas_score
SWE-bench Pro58.4 %coding · swe_bench_pro_score
Context200,000 tokenscontext · context
Speed177.11 c/sperformance · throughput
Latency30,761.47 msperformance · latency
Input price1.4 $/Mpricing · input_price
Output price4.4 $/Mpricing · output_price
Parameters754,000,000,000 paramsmodel · params
Arena Rating1,469.34metric
Arena Rank11metric
Vote Count11,808metric

Evidence

Citations and source overlap

FAQ

How should I read this profile?

Treat this as a source-backed model dossier, not an EvalKit-run verification. The public values are replicated from linked sources and kept source-scoped.

Is GLM-5.1 verified by EvalKit?

No. EvalKit currently shows 0 verified rows until real run evidence exists.

Why can metrics disagree?

Different sources test different tasks, dates, prompts, and aggregation methods. EvalKit keeps those differences visible instead of merging them into a fake universal score.