← All models
Anthropic · proprietary
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 by Anthropic appears in 1 source with Reasoning at 65.69. Best read for LLM, Long context, Low cost.
CreatorAnthropic
Release date2026-05-28
Knowledge cutoffNot published
Context1M tokens
Input price$5/M tokens
Output price$25/M tokens
Modalitytext + vision
CountryUS
Metrics
All source-backed metrics
LLM Stats Rank63ranking · source_rank
Reasoning65.69reasoning · index_reasoning
Math54.54math · index_math
Coding52.28coding · index_code
Research39.16research · index_search
Vision48.23multimodal · index_vision
Tool calling41.61tool_calling · index_tool_calling
Long context34.13long_context · index_long_context
Finance31.22domain · index_finance
Legal41.19domain · index_legal
GPQA93.6 %reasoning · gpqa_score
SWE-bench Verified88.6 %coding · swe_bench_verified_score
Code Arena805.44 %coding · coding_arena_score
Humanity Last Exam57.9 %reasoning · hle_score
BrowseComp84.3 %research · browsecomp_score
Toolathlon59.9 %tool_calling · toolathlon_score
MCP Atlas82.2 %tool_calling · mcp_atlas_score
SWE-bench Pro69.2 %coding · swe_bench_pro_score
CharXiv-R89.9 %multimodal · charxiv_r_score
ScreenSpot Pro87.9 %multimodal · screenspot_pro_score
Context1,000,000 tokenscontext · context
Speed116.74 c/sperformance · throughput
Latency1,665.12 msperformance · latency
Input price5 $/Mpricing · input_price
Output price25 $/Mpricing · output_price
Evidence
Citations and source overlap
FAQ
How should I read this profile?
Treat this as a source-backed model dossier, not an EvalKit-run verification. The public values are replicated from linked sources and kept source-scoped.
Is Claude Opus 4.8 verified by EvalKit?
No. EvalKit currently shows 0 verified rows until real run evidence exists.
Why can metrics disagree?
Different sources test different tasks, dates, prompts, and aggregation methods. EvalKit keeps those differences visible instead of merging them into a fake universal score.